Positivist and Phenomenological Research In Public Administration

Al-Habil, Wasim Ismail

doi:10.21608/aja.2014.19050

Positivist and Phenomenological Research In Public Administration

نوع المستند : بحوث باللغة الإنجلیزیة

المؤلف

Wasim Ismail Al-Habil

College of Commerce, The Islamic University of Gaza Palestine

10.21608/aja.2014.19050

المستخلص

The research discusses what are the major similarities and differences in how a public administrator committed to the positivist perspective and one committed to the interpretivist or phenomenological perspective would approach the task of understanding and acting in public organizations? This paper considers how the two different theories, positivism and interpretivism, influence the way of thinking and practicing in the field of public administration.
The research discusses the core concepts of positivism and interpretivism and presents the role of positivist research in public administration, which dominated the establishment of public administration during the Progressive era, as well as the limitations associated with it. In addition, the research provides a better understanding of the historical context in which other new alternative theories were presented in the field, including interpretivism. The article highlights their similarities and differences before it concludes with how these theories are related to the practice in public administration.

الموضوعات الرئيسية

المحاسبة

المراجع

- Adams, G. (1992). "Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration", Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, 363-373.

- Bailey, M. (1992). "Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research", Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, 47-54.

- Dahl R. (2001). "The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems", In C. Stivers (Ed.). Bureaucracy, Democracy, and the Study of Administration. PP. 60-76. ASPA Classics Series. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

- Fay, B. (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin Hyman.

- Fox, C. and H. Miller. (1998). "Positivism", In: J. Shafritz (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. PP. 1718-1723. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

- Friedrich, C. (1940). "Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility", Public Policy, Vol. 1, 3-24.

- Fry, B. (1998). Mastering public administration: from Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. New York: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.

- Fry, B. and L. Nigro. (1998). "Five great issues in the profession of public administration", In: J.Rabin, W. Hildreth and G. Hiller (Eds.), Handbook of Pubic Administration. PP. 1163-1221. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

- Goodnow, F. (2005). Politics and administration. New Brunswick, N. J.: Transaction Publishers.

- Henry, N. (2001). Public administration and public affairs. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.

- Hummel, R. (1991). "The stories managers tell: Why they are valid as science", Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 31-41.

- Lincoln, Y. and E. Guba. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

- Lynn, L. E. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.

- McCurdy, H. and Cleary, R. (1984). "Why we can’t resolve the research issue in public administration", Public Administration Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 49-55.

- Ritchie, J. and J. Lewis, (2003). Qualitative research practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.

- Simon H. (1946). Administrative Behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.

- Spicer, M. (1995). The founders, the Constitution, and public administration: a conflict in worldviews. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

- Stillman, R. (2000). "The study of public administration in the United States: The eminently practical science", In: R. Stillman (Ed.), Public Administration: Concepts and Cases. PP. 17-30. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

- Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: constructing public administration in the progressive era. Kansas: The University Press of Kansas.

- Stivers, C. (2001). "Introductions", In: C. Stivers (Ed.). Bureaucracy, Democracy, and the Study of Administration. ASPA Classics Series. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

- Taylor, Fredrick W. (1998). The principles of scientific management. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.

- Uveges, J. and Keller, L. (1998). "One hundred years of American public administration and counting", In: J. Rabin, W. Hildreth and G. Hiller (Eds.), Handbook of Pubic Administration. PP. 1-47. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

- Vintriss, C. (1991). Contemporary issues in American public administration education: the search for an educational focus. Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 4-14.

- Waldo, D. (1955). The study of public administration. New York, NY: Random House.

- Waugh, W. (1998). "Phenomenology", In: T. Lynch and T. Dicker (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Theory and Management: the Philosophical Approach. New York, NY: M. Dekker.

- White, J. (1999). The narrative foundations of public administration research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

- Wilson, W. (2000). "The study of administration", In: R. Stillman (Ed.), Public Administration: Concepts and Cases,PP. 6-16. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.