مناهج النظرية المجذرة في دراسات العلوم الإدارية: تجارب واقعية

نوع المستند : بحوث باللغة العربیة

المؤلفون

قسم إدارة الأعمال، کلية الاقتصاد والعلوم الإدارية، جامعة الإمام محمد بن سعود الإسلامية، المملکة العربية السعودية

المستخلص

اکتسبت النظرية المجذرة (Grounded Theory) في الآونة الأخيـرة شعبية بيـن مناهج دراسات العلوم الإدارية نظرًا لقدرتها على توفيـر أوصاف وتحليل وموضوعات معقدة من واقع المنظمات. غيـر أن الباحثيـن، وخصوصًا المبتدئيـن، قد يواجهون عقبات مختلفة في تطبيق منهجيات النظرية المجذرة. فبالرغم من أنه نوقش الکثيـر منها، وخاصةً في أدبيات دراسات العلوم الإدارية باللغة الإنجليـزية، فإن هذه المناقشات قد لا تـزال تـربک الباحث، مما قد يؤدي إلى تطبيق وإنتاج غيـر کامل للنظرية المجذرة في أبحاث العلوم الإدارية. علاوة على ذلک، يکتب ويوثق عدد قليل من الباحثيـن باللغة العربية عن تجاربهم العملية، فيما يخص خبـراتهم في استخدام النظرية المجذرة وتطبيقها، مما يُوجد فجوة في أدبيات اللغة العربية. وعليه، تحاول هذه الورقة، من خلال استخدام دراستي حالة واقعية في سياق أبحاث العلوم الإدارية، أن تعکس تجارب فعلية لتوجه الباحثيـن وتوضيح بعض العقبات والخطوات التي ينطوي عليها اختيار النظرية المجذرة ومساعدتهم في استخدام الشکل الأنسب للنظرية المجذرة وتطبيقها في مجال أبحاث العلوم الإدارية.
Grounded theory has recently gained recognition within the context of business studies, due to its capability to provide real and comprehensive descriptions of organisations issues. However, researchers, especially beginners, may face different obstacles in applying grounded theory methodologies. Although much has been discussed in English business studies literature, these discussions may still confuse the researcher, which may lead to producing imperfect use of the grounded theory.
Furthermore, a few researchers have reflected and documented their experiences in using and applying grounded theory, which creates a gap in Arabic business studies literature. By using two factual case studies, within the context of business studies, this paper attempts to reflect actual experiences and provides guidance to researchers, through clarifying some of the obstacles and steps involving the grounded theory process. This aims to assist researchers in using and applying the most appropriate forms of grounded theory in the field of business studies.

الكلمات الرئيسية

المراجع

أولاً - مراجع باللغة العربية:
الذيباني، حسن بن مرشد معتق. (2011). مدخل لمنهج النظرية المجذرة. الاجتماعية، (4), 8–33.
ثانيًا - مراجع باللغة الإنجليـزية:
Abrahamson, E. (2008). “22 things I hate: Mini rants on management research”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 17 (4), 422–425.
Alammar, F. M. (2018). Business diplomacy in practice: A grounded theory study in management among professional diplomats, [Doctoral dissertation, Massey University]. Massey Research Online. http://hdl.handle.net/10179/13615
Aldhobaib, Meshal. (2017). The relationship between organizational culture and individual behavior in Saudi Arabia, [Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University]. Online Research @ Cardiff. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/107352/
Allaire, Yvan and Firsirotu, Mihaela. (1984). “Theory of organizational culture”, Organization Studies, 5 (1): 193-226.
Alvesson, Mats. (2016). “Organizational culture and work”, In: S. Edgell; H. Gottfried & E. Granter (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociology of work and employment, (pp. 262-282). London: Sage.
Birks, M. & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London, UK: Sage publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
Chatman, Jennifer & O’Reilly, Charles. (2016). “Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 36 :199-224.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13 ( (1, 3–21.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
El Hussein, M. T.; Kennedy, A. & Oliver, B. (2017). “Grounded theory and the conundrum of literature review: Framework for novice researchers”, The Qualitative Report, 22 ( (4, 1198–1210.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence Vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2009). “The novice GT researcher”, The Grounded Theory Review, 8 (2), 1-21.
Glaser, B. (2014). “Choosing grounded theory”, The Grounded Theory Review, 13 (2), 3-19.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1964). “The social loss of dying patients”, American Journal of Nursing, 64 ( (6), 119–121.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Glaze, J. (2002). Ph.D. study and the use of a reflective diary: A dialogue with self. Reflective Practice, 3 ( (2, 153-166.
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Heath, H. & Cowley, S. (2004). “Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 (2), 141–150.
Intezari, A. & Pauleen, D. (2018). “Conceptualizing wise management decision‐making: A grounded theory approach”, Decision Sciences, 49 (2), 335-400.
Jones, R. & Noble, G. (2007). “Grounded theory and management research: A lack of integrity?” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2 (2), 84–103.
Kenny, M. & Fourie, R. (2015). “Contrasting classic, Straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: methodological and philosophical conflicts”, Qualitative Report, 20 (8), 1270–1289.
Länsisalmi, H.; Peiró, J. M. & Kivimäki, M. (2004). “Grounded theory in organizational research”, In: C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, (pp. 242–255). UK, London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Locke, K. (1996). “Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years?”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 5 (3), 239-245.
Lussier-Ley, C. (2010). “Dialoguing with body: A Self-study in relational pedagogy through embodiment and the therapeutic relationship”, The Qualitative Report, 15(1), 196-214.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organisations: The three perspectives. NY, New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J.; Frost, P. and O’Neill, O. A. (2006). “Organisational culture: Beyond struggles for intellectual dominance”, In: Clegg, S.; Hardy, C.; Lawrence, T. and Nord, W. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of organisation studies. London: Sage, pp. 725-753.
Martin, Joanne & Frost, Peter. (2011). “The organizational culture war games”, In: M. Godwyn & J. H. Gittel (eds.), Sociology of organizations: Structures and relationships. (pp. 315-336). London: Sage.
Oktay, J. S. (2012). Grounded theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Smircich, Linda. (1983). “Concepts of culture and organizational analysis”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (3): 339-359.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newburry Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Suddaby, R. (2006). “From the editors: What grounded theory is not”, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 633–642.
Tan, J. (2014). “Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers”, Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.
Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. London, UK: SAGE Publications Inc.
Quirkos. (2020). www.quirkos.com
Russell Group .(2020). www.russellgroup.ac.uk

ملفات

شارك

إرسال الاستشهاد إلى

الإحصائيات